Low-quality Trials as a Source of Heterogeneity in the Association of Hydroxyethyl Starch 130/0.4 or 0.42 with Excess Mortality in Sepsis
نویسنده
چکیده
In the methods section, they stated that risk assessment was performed as advised by the Cochrane collaboration. Assessment includes “randomization sequence generation,” “allocation concealment,” “blinding,” “incomplete outcome data,” and “selective outcome reporting.” In Table 2 of Ma et al.[1] however, assessed domains differed with “intention‐to‐treat analysis” and “no loss to follow‐up” replacing “incomplete outcome data” and “selective outcome reporting.” The Cochrane collaboration’s tool for assessing the risk of bias recommends that assessment of “other potential bias” be included, however, no such attempts were made, but bias assessment appears incomplete and flawed.
منابع مشابه
Sources of Heterogeneity in Trials Reporting Hydroxyethyl Starch 130/0.4 or 0.42 Associated Excess Mortality in Septic Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-regression
BACKGROUND This meta-analysis was to determine the association of the cumulative dose of 130/0.4 or 0.42 (hydroxyethyl starch [HES] 130/0.4*) or delta daily fluid balance (i.e., daily fluid balance in HES group over or below control group) with the heterogeneity of risk ratio (RR) for mortality in randomized control trials (RCTs). METHODS Three databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane) were search...
متن کاملIs hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 safe?
It is heavily debated whether or not treatment with hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 contributes to the development of acute kidney failure in patients with severe sepsis. In the previous issue of Critical Care, Muller and colleagues report no association between initial resuscitation with hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 and renal impairment in a cohort of septic patients. Can we then consider hydroxyet...
متن کاملEquivalent efficacy of hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 and human serum albumin: if nothing is the same, is everything different? The importance of context in clinical trials and statistics.
1249 December 2013 D URING the past year, there has been substantial discussion about hydroxyethyl starches (HESs), with some claiming that neither efficacy nor safety has been demonstrated. In this issue of ANEStHESIoloGy, Van der linden et al.1 report a clinical efficacy trial with HES 130/0.4 that has several interesting issues. Some, but not all, are discussed relatively briefly, as space l...
متن کاملIncomparable Subsequent Effects between Study and Control Fluids Might Cause Questionable Results in Randomized Controlled Trials
117 RefeRences 1. Ma PL, Peng XX, Du B, Hu XL, Gong YC, Wang Y, et al. Sources of heterogeneity in trials reporting hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 or 0.42 associated excess mortality in septic patients: A systematic review and meta‐regression. Chin Med J 2015;128:2374‐82. doi: 10.4103/0366‐ 6999.163387. 2. Zhu GC, Quan ZY, Shao YS, Zhao JG, Zhang YT. The study of hypertonic saline and hydroxyethyl...
متن کاملMarkers of endothelial dysfunction in patients with severe sepsis resuscitated with hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 vs. ringer's acetate
Introduction The Scandinavian Starch for Severe Sepsis/Septic Shock (6S) trial [1] showed increased mortality in patients with severe sepsis resuscitated with hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 (HES) vs. Ringer’s acetate. The underlying pathophysiological mechanisms are, however, not fully elucidated. The endothelium may be important for the effects of fluid therapy, and the different fluids may impa...
متن کامل